The problem
Security teams run exposure tools, application controls and identity systems that do not share context. Each answers its own question well, and none can say how the answers relate.
Adding another isolated dashboard does not fix that. What is missing is a shared layer that connects the signals and a path from signal to action.
How Neonix approaches it
- 01
Data sources
Internet, cloud, applications, APIs, identities, SaaS, infrastructure and threat feeds are the inputs. Each product reads the sources relevant to its domain.
- 02
Security products
Cybrmonk assesses external risk, CybrWAF application risk and CybrIdentity identity risk. CybrRonin adds adversary testing against targets you have proven you own.
- 03
The Security Fabric
The Fabric is the shared layer: a security graph, risk engine, AI, analytics, correlation, policy and automation. It relates what each product sees and decides what is worth acting on.
- 04
Action and integration
Prioritized context is delivered to SIEM, SOAR, ITSM, cloud, IAM, EDR and DevSecOps tooling, so action happens in the systems teams already use.
What the Fabric provides
- Security graph
- Risk engine
- AI
- Analytics
- Correlation
- Policy
- Automation
How it connects
Design principles: context rather than another dashboard, products that can be adopted one at a time, and integration with the tools already in place rather than replacement by default.
All integrations in the directory are live today across identity, SIEM, SOAR, cloud, ITSM and DevSecOps. Each has setup documentation.
Where to start
- Start with the domain that carries the most risk, since the architecture lets context connect as more products are added.
- List the identity, SIEM and ticketing tools in use, so integrations can be planned from the start.
- Review the Trust Center for security, privacy and disclosure information.