The problem
Four products can look like a long evaluation. They do not need to be one. Each addresses a distinct question, and an evaluation can begin with a single product and a single domain.
How Neonix approaches it
- 01
Start with what you cannot currently see
If the question is what is visible from outside, which credentials are exposed or which threats target you, begin with Cybrmonk.
- 02
Start with what is under attack
If web applications and APIs face abusive traffic or you do not have an inventory of APIs, begin with CybrWAF.
- 03
Start with who has access
If access reviews are heavy, leavers are slow to be removed or privileged access is unmanaged, begin with CybrIdentity.
- 04
Start with proof
If you need evidence that an exposed path can actually be used, on targets you have proven you own, CybrRonin is in early access and available by request.
How the products combine
- Cybrmonk with CybrWAF: what is reachable, and how that reachability is controlled
- Cybrmonk with CybrRonin: what is reachable, and whether it can be used
- CybrIdentity with CybrWAF: who can reach an application, and what that traffic looks like
- All products through the Security Fabric: one correlated view and one path to action
How it connects
Evaluating one product first is supported. The architecture is designed so context connects as more of the ecosystem is adopted.
To compare capabilities side by side, use the comparison page.
Where to start
- Write down the domains, brands and key applications you would want in scope.
- List your identity sources and the SIEM, SOAR and ticketing tools in use.
- Name the one question you want answered in the first conversation.