The problem
A security operations team receives alerts from many tools, and each one carries only part of the story. Analysts spend their time stitching context together, and response steps differ from one analyst to the next.
After an incident, reconstructing what happened means gathering evidence that was never collected in one place.
How Neonix approaches it
- 01
Correlate before escalating
Signals from exposure, application and identity sources are correlated, so an analyst sees one prioritized item with its context instead of several unrelated alerts.
- 02
Investigate with context
Threat investigation is enriched with threat intelligence, so the first question, who and why, is already answered.
- 03
Respond through your tools
Response automation and SIEM and SOAR workflows carry prioritized signals into the platforms the team already operates, with ITSM tools used for tickets and follow-up.
- 04
Reconstruct what happened
Forensic timeline reconstruction supports incident review, so the sequence of events can be rebuilt rather than guessed.
What the security operations capability covers
- Signal correlation and triage
- Threat investigation
- Threat intelligence enrichment
- Automated response playbooks
- SIEM and SOAR workflows
- Forensic timeline reconstruction
How it connects
Neonix adds connected context and action paths to the SIEM and SOAR platforms you already run. Whether anything is replaced depends on the product, the deployed architecture and verified integration support.
Live integrations include Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk, Elastic and Cortex XSOAR for events and response, and ServiceNow and Jira for tickets.
Where to start
- Choose the one workflow that costs the team the most time, such as triage or incident review, and connect it first.
- Agree what an analyst should see on a single prioritized item before automating anything.
- If you are dealing with an active incident now, use the incident report page rather than waiting for a review.